Internet Premier Czech Information Resource For Everybody since 1994
Talk America
Read For Less
Call For Less
  HOME | ADD COMPANY TO CZECH BUSINESS DIRECTORY | ADD POSTING TO BULLETIN BOARD  
TABLE OF CONTENTS >
WHAT'S NEW >

Business Directory RSSRSS

Export-Import RSSRSS

Busines News RSSRSS

News RSSRSS

Exchange Rates RSSRSS

Re: All in Good Cause

 List
Subject: Re: All in Good Cause
Poster: okyn@bu.edu
Date: 21 Mar 2007 17:01:49 -0700
Related Postings: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
On Mar 21, 5:34 pm, "Zdislav V. Kovarik" wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Jiri Pecka wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 09:26:04 -0700, Karel Kriz
> > wrote:
>
> > >In article <45fe80dd.13192015@news-server>,
> > > nos...@nospam.com (Jiri Pecka) wrote:
>
> > >> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:24:10 +1000, Stan R wrote:
>
> > >> <..>
>
> > >> Nah, we won't be bothered reading it.
> > >> We *know* it can't be true because:
>
> > >> 1. It is too long.
> > >> 2. It is too shrill.
> > >> 3. It does not agree with what Al Gore says.
>
> > >> And, besides, you are a biased right-wing pro-globalization
> > >> capitalist, no doubt on the payroll of a major
> > >> child-labour-exploiting, profit-driven, racist and fascist
> > >> multinational corporation.
>
> > >> Jiri Pecka,
> > >> Your Friendly Local Carbon Footprint Specialist
>
> > >> *** Call me on 01232 6678 6777 to to purchase your carbon credits at
> > >> unbelievable never-to-be-repeated prices, NOW!!! ***
>
> > >Maybe. Maybe not. The article is fiction, F I C T I O N, written by a
> > >science fiction writer using fictional characters. So it's just
> > >speculation. Vapor.
>
> > >Is this is what you base your opinions on?
>
> > >K
>
> > Sadly, it's not fiction, even though it starts like one.
> > I bet you didn't read it beyond the first few lines.
>
> > But even if it was fiction, Karl, there are enough facts already.
> > Have you looked at the BBC documentary yet?
> > I bet not. And do you know why? Because you
> > don't want to. You are not in the least interested in facts.
> > In fact you are *afraid* of facts.
>
> > And this "fiction" article shows precisely the reasons why it is so:
> > Once people invest their money and energy in a scam, they tend to
> > ignore facts and hold onto the scam for as long as possible.
> > Some (in this particular case many) do so because of vested interests;
> > some because of pride alone (does it include you?) - it becomes
> > *their* scam.
>
> > Never mind, time will show. But it won't be cheap.
> > This is a megascam, a defining scam of decades if not a generation,
> > just like communism once was. The only people who will benefit will be
> > high-flying scamsters and the Al Gores of this world. But I guess this
> > is the way you like it.
>
> > Jiri Pecka
>
> That's the point: if and when the scam bubble bursts, the perpetrators
> will be impossible to find: switched to other enterprise, retired, moved
> away (if alive), the more brazen ones lecturing against what they had
> preached before, ... - but enjoying the loot.
> Except for the dupes who fell for it because of Mr. Gore's or
> somebody else's charisma, and who will join the ruined crowd.
>
> Cheers, Slavek(ZVK)
> --------------------------------------------
> - Dedecku, dedecku, rikali nam ve skole, ze nase generace se
> dozije komunismu!
> - Me nenaseres, ja mam rakovinu.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

The article by Card is impressive but rests primarily on the suggestion that Mann manipulated data, to obtain the hockey stick effect. In spite of that there is a possibility that "the global warming" side may still be right. Remember that Gregor Mendel was also accused of manipulating his data to get desired results of his experiments. But today we know that in spite of that his theory was correct.

On the other hand the BBC film shows many more convincing facts. The basic argument: [Sun (sunspots) -> warming or cooling earth -> increase or decrease of CO2 with considerable lag] seems to be well documented and that would falsify the hypothesis that global warming is the result of human activity. To disprove this conclusion, it would be needed either to prove that there is something wrong with their data or alternatively to prove that not CO2 but something else generated by the human activity is the main cause of global warming.

O.K.

 

Czech Info Center is not responsible for content of this message.

InvestExpress Prayers Free RSS

Copyright © 1994-2006
CZECH INFO CENTER
Awards | Letter From Publisher | Privacy Policy | Tell A Friend